| This Study was written and submitted by: Joseph M. Willmouth, Pastor of Trinity Bible Church in Biloxi, Mississippi 39532. This contributed article is copyright protected, and the sole property of the contributing author. It may be freely copied and used provided the above credits are included. Document expiration: indefinite. Dr Willmouth States, "These Outlines were prepared for our Sunday Evening Bible Study, as a 2 page handout (front & back), at Trinity Bible Church, Biloxi, Mississippi." |
|
|
The webservant of bibleteacher.org began using these excellent studies in our local Bible study group. Any additional notes added by bibleteacher.org as a result of this independent study will be marked and enclosed by this type of table. This way the original work of Dr. Willmouth will in no way be modified. |
1.Hanging a criminal on a tree.
A. After the criminal was put to death for a capital offense, his body was hanged on a tree as a warning to all who saw it not to commit the same offense (v.22).2. This text was used by the Apostle Paul to support the doctrine of Christ's penal substitutionary death for sinners and the humiliation that Jesus faced on the cross as a curse of one exposed as a criminal although he was bearing the sins of others (Gal.3:13) ..
B. The criminal was under God's curse because he had broken God's Law by committing a crime worthy of death, and not because his body was hung on a tree (v.23).1) The hanging of the body displays that judgment by the humiliation of hanging his body in public shows that the person is under God's curse.
2) The exposure of his body was the utmost desecration. but even that had its limits, therefore the body was not to be left on the tree overnight.- Since the body was unclean, it was to be taken down at sundown so as not to decay further and defile the land.
|
|
FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy
21:22-23 "And if a man have committed a sin worthy of death, and he be
to be put to death, and thou hang him on a tree: [23] His body shall
not remain all night upon the tree, but thou shalt in any wise bury him
that day; (for he that is hanged is accursed of God;) that thy land be
not defiled, which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance."
Now the Lord turns to the concept of Capital Punishment in Israel. One reason that Capital Punishment, the taking of a murderer's life, was so effective among God's people was that the sentence was carried out PUBLICLY. In Deuteronomy 21:21 we saw this same principle applied toward the "rebellious son". Again, though there was no record that any parent every brought their child forward for repeatedly breaking the Fifth Commandment (honor of father and mother), God did say that IF this was done then the rebellious son was to be executed PUBLICLY, SUPPORTING ~ Deuteronomy 21:21 "And ALL THE MEN OF HIS CITY shall stone him with stones, that he die: so SHALT THOU PUT EVIL AWAY from among you; and ALL ISRAEL SHALL HEAR, AND FEAR. Capital punishment was never hidden behind closed doors in God's Kingdom, but was always committed PUBLICLY. Why? So that "ALL ISRAEL SHALL HEAR, AND FEAR", i.e., so that the public will see that Law Enforcement in Israel CAN and DOES execute those guilty of Capital Offense. It is no deterrent to just "hear" about someone losing their life .... but the punishment for Capital Crime becomes a stark reality in a man's life when he actually has to HELP EXECUTE the guilty. Now the thing you heard about, the penalty for murder, kidnapping, or abuse of your parents ... now that thing has become a reality. And, once you helped participate in the event, this helps drive home the point - Don't do the crime unless you want to suffer the consequences. Verse 22 takes God's stance on Capital Punishment one step further. In ancient Israel hanging was NOT a method of execution. The Israelites exercised Capital Punishment against a guilty party by stoning, or casting stones at the person until he was beaten to death. The phrase "stone him with stones", denoting this method of execution, is mentioned 29 times in the Law by the Lord. The stoning was the method used. But AFTER the criminal was stoned, that person's body was sometimes HUNG UP on a tree as a PUBLIC DISPLAY to all Israel. This corpse became, in effect, a SIGN to the Children of Israel of what would happen to them if they committed the same crime ... and because of this had a deterrent effect on crime. What was hung on the tree was the body, devoid of life. A good example of this can be found in: SUPPORTING ~ Joshua 10:1-5 "Now it came to pass, when Adonizedek king of Jerusalem had heard how Joshua had taken Ai, and had utterly destroyed it; as he had done to Jericho and her king, so he had done to Ai and her king; and how the inhabitants of Gibeon had made peace with Israel, and were among them; [2] That they feared greatly, because Gibeon was a great city, as one of the royal cities, and because it was greater than Ai, and all the men thereof were mighty. [3] Wherefore Adonizedek king of Jerusalem sent unto Hoham king of Hebron, and unto Piram king of Jarmuth, and unto Japhia king of Lachish, and unto Debir king of Eglon, saying, [4] Come up unto me, and help me, that we may smite Gibeon: for it hath made peace with Joshua and with the children of Israel. [5] Therefore the five kings of the Amorites, the king of Jerusalem, the king of Hebron, the king of Jarmuth, the king of Lachish, the king of Eglon, gathered themselves together, and went up, they and all their hosts, and encamped before Gibeon, and made war against it." The children of Israel had entered the Promised Land and, as they went through the Land guided by God, they cast out the Canaanites as the Lord had decreed (among those nations were the Amorites), and conquered but made peace treaties with all who were not of Canaan. One of the cities that made peace with Israel was Gibeon. Though Gibeon was a city occupied by the Hivites, descendents of Canaan, these people repented of their evil and were willing to provide wood for the building of the Temple of God. When the five kings of the cities around Gibeon heard of this treaty, they decided to attack Gibeon - which was a serious mistake. The Lord led Joshua to lead His Army against these five kings who dared shun a treaty endorsed by the Creator. The text tells us: SUPPORTING ~ Joshua 10:8-14 "And the LORD said unto Joshua, Fear them not: for I have delivered them into thine hand; there shall not a man of them stand before thee. [9] Joshua therefore came unto them suddenly, and went up from Gilgal all night. [10] And the LORD discomfited them before Israel, and slew them with a great slaughter at Gibeon, and chased them along the way that goeth up to Bethhoron, and smote them to Azekah, and unto Makkedah. [11] And it came to pass, as they fled from before Israel, and were in the going down to Bethhoron, that the LORD cast down great stones from heaven upon them unto Azekah, and they died: they were more which died with hailstones than they whom the children of Israel slew with the sword. [12] Then spake Joshua to the LORD in the day when the LORD delivered up the Amorites before the children of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel, Sun, stand thou still upon Gibeon; and thou, Moon, in the valley of Ajalon. [13] And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day. [14] And there was no day like that before it or after it, that the LORD hearkened unto the voice of a man: for the LORD fought for Israel." Only a fool attacks the friend of God, and these five kings were fools. The kings ran and hid themselves in a cave at Makkedah, but Joshua discovered their location and had them trapped in the cave. When Israel returned from battle, Joshua called all of the men of Israel out to witness these five kings, idolaters all, in their degradation. Once all of Israel saw these defeated rulers, the Bible tells us that Joshua: SUPPORTING ~ Joshua 10:25-27 "And Joshua said unto them, Fear not, nor be dismayed, be strong and of good courage: for thus shall the LORD do to all your enemies against whom ye fight. [26] And afterward Joshua smote them, and slew them, and hanged them on five trees: and they were hanging upon the trees until the evening. [27] And it came to pass at the time of the going down of the sun, that Joshua commanded, and they took them down off the trees, and cast them into the cave wherein they had been hid, and laid great stones in the cave's mouth, which remain until this very day." Just as our text in Deuteronomy teaches, Joshua executed these men and, after their execution, they were hung on five trees. They were left on the trees as a public SIGN TO ALL as to what would happen to those who rejected the Creator's Rule and Word. At the going down of the sun the bodies of these criminals were removed from the trees, and cast back into the cave - their hiding place became the final resting place of their bodies. FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy 21:23 ".. His body shall not remain all night upon the tree, but thou shalt in any wise bury him that day; (for he that is hanged is accursed of God;) .." Joshua took their bodies down in accordance with the Law of the Lord in Deuteronomy. The bodies were removed because, "he that is hanged is accursed of God" . The word "accursed", the Hebrew {qlalah [kel-aw-law']}, meaning "to be under God's curse". The individual who was hung was guilty of breaking God's Law, God's Word, God's Covenant - and by hanging him in plain view, all who saw him recognized that he had died the death of the polluted, the unclean. As soon as the public saw the effect of sin upon this person's life the corpse was buried, lest it decay and fall to the ground - further polluting God's land. The criminal was guilty, and his guilt was demonstrated to all. The Apostle Paul, under the leading of God's Holy Spirit, wrote these words: SUPPORTING ~ Galatians 3:11-13 "But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith. [12] And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them. [13] Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree" In the days of ancient Israel the criminal, once convicted, was executed by stoning and hung on a tree as a sign to all that he was cursed. He deserved this punishment. The Law Enforcement Officials of the city, the elders and judges, they had examined the man and found him guilty. Two or more witnesses had come forward with clear testimonies supporting the guilt of the criminal. He deserved the death he got, under God's pure Law, he deserved it. But One came forward out of the hundreds, perhaps thousands that deserved deaths as criminals, and this One had no guilt in Him. No two witnesses could come forward and truthfully declare He had committed an act worthy of death. The elders and the judges of the city rigged the courtroom, and purposely lied and hired liars to bring this One to death. This One, Jesus Christ, was judged guilty though He was innocent, then He hung on the tree in shame so that my guilt could be erased, atoned, forgiven. The One who hung on that Cross followed the Law perfectly in His lifetime. Never a sin stained His soul. Yet He died to remove the stains of sin from my soul. To free us from the curse of the Law, Jesus had to become cursed Himself - and bear the same shame that every executed criminal bore. For us! Matthew Henry "Though deliverance is not to be expected from the law, there is a way open to escape the curse, and regain the favor of God, namely, through faith in Christ. Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law; being made sin, or a sin offering, for us, he was made a curse for us; not separated from God, but laid for a time under the Divine punishment. The heavy sufferings of the Son of God, more loudly warn sinners to flee from the wrath to come, than all the curses of the law; for how can God spare any man who remains under sin, seeing that he spared not his own Son, when our sins were charged upon him? Yet at the same time, Christ, as from the cross, freely invites sinners to take refuge in him. " |
Application: This
visually gruesome act of hanging a dead criminal on a tree, shows God's
contempt upon those who violate His commands that respect people and lives.
In the same way, the world showed it's contempt upon God's Son when they
hung him on a tree for sins or crimes which He did not commit. And yet
God's
love permitted it so that penalty of mans' sins could be paid in full (John
3:16; 19:30; 2 Cor.5:21; Rom.3:23; 5:8, 12; 10:9-13).
II. Miscellaneous Laws Of Behavior
(22:1-12).
|
|
When we consider the Law of God given
through Moses, most of us have been conditioned to equate the "Law" to
the "Ten Commandments". Yes, the Ten Commandments were the initiation
of the Mosaic Law, but they were NOT the whole of the Law. God's Law in
the Ten Commandments gave Israel and the individual Israelite a basic moral
code that they were to follow to maintain their society. God also gave
Israel codes in the Law that controlled worship and ritual, sanitation
and diet, behavior and dress. There were few gray areas in God's
Law: an action was either prescribed by God, and therefore righteous, or
rejected by God and therefore evil.
Though we who are under Christ are freed from the Law so we can live by the higher Law of righteousness in Christ, as the Scripture says: ~ SUPPORTING ~ Romans 8:2-4 "For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death. [3] For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: [4] That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit." We must ALWAYS remember that the same Spirit of God that we follow after today WROTE THIS LAW that we are now reading. God's righteousness has not changed. It was wrong, according to God's Law, to commit murder BEFORE the Cross of Christ, and it is STILL just as wrong to commit murder today. This standard of righteousness has not changed. Furthermore, the believer who "walk[s] not after the flesh, but after the Spirit" would NEVER murder anyone, for the same Spirit who wrote the injunction against such behavior has not changed, and would NOT lead a believer to commit murder. The Christian today is therefore under a higher consciousness of sin because he or she is indwelt by the Giver of the Law and Righteousness. Are we free from the Law? Yes, we are freed from offering sacrifices, from wearing tassels on our clothes, from rituals and ceremonies that are strictly for Israel. Are we freed from THE RIGHTEOUS BEHAVIOR REFLECTED IN GOD's LAW? Absolutely not! God is still God, and standards of righteousness given by God for His people do NOT change. Or, as Paul put it: SUPPORTING ~ Romans 6:15-16 "What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid. [16] Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?" |
1. Responsibilities towards a neighbor's possessions (22:1-4).
A. Straying domestic animals are not to be ignored and were to be returned to their owner, if he is known (vv.1-2).B. The same principle applies to anything that a person loses and another person finds (v. 3).1) When an owner does not live nearby, or if they are unknown, then the person who saw the stray must take it to his own place for safekeeping until the owner comes searching for it.
2) The animal is to be restored to the owner when they come looking for it.
C. They were to also show concern for an animal that has fallen and were required to help it to its feet (v. 4).1) This may not necessarily refer to an animal that had strayed in verses 1 and 2.
2) This verse more-than-likely is talking about an animal that has fallen under a load with the owner beside him (Exod 23:5).A) Because of the weight of the load, the owner alone would not be able to assist the animal to its feet and would need help.
B) But in any case, the Israelites were obligated to assist.
|
|
FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy
22:1-4 "Thou shalt not see thy brother's ox or his sheep go astray,
and hide thyself from them: thou shalt in any case bring them again unto
thy brother. [2] And if thy brother be not nigh unto
thee, or if thou know him not, then thou shalt bring it unto thine own
house, and it shall be with thee until thy brother seek after it, and thou
shalt restore it to him again. [3] In like manner shalt
thou do with his ass; and so shalt thou do with his raiment; and with all
lost thing of thy brother's, which he hath lost, and thou hast found, shalt
thou do likewise: thou mayest not hide thyself. [4] Thou
shalt not see thy brother's ass or his ox fall down by the way, and hide
thyself from them: thou shalt surely help him to lift them up again."
Though the Ten Commandments were the start or initiation of the Mosaic Law, the DRIVING FORCE behind the Law was love. As we have studied before, the Law focused on love both Godward and man-ward. The command, "Love the Lord thy God" is found nine times in the Book of Deuteronomy. In fact, our Lord Jesus, when asked what the basis of the Law was, responded: SUPPORTING ~ Matthew 22:37-40 "Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. [38] This is the first and great commandment. [39] And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. [40] On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets." These passages in Deuteronomy redirect the Israelite back to this Law of Love. In an agricultural society like Israel, animals like oxen or sheep represented wealth. The farmer used the oxen to plow his fields, and the sheep for both food and clothing. The jackass was used for transportation, or as a beast of burden. The Lord wanted each of His children to remember that the wealth they possessed was given to each person by His Grace. If a person lost their oxen, sheep, or jackass - or any beast of burden, for that matter - then it was up to each Israelite to recapture the animal and return it to its owner. A wandering beast of burden could not be kept by the finder - there was no "finders keepers, losers weepers". If God did not specifically give the item to you, be it gold, gems, land, or animals, then you had NO right to keep it. SUPPORTING ~ Exodus 23:4-5 "If thou meet thine enemy's ox or his ass going astray, thou shalt surely bring it back to him again. [5] If thou see the ass of him that hateth thee lying under his burden, and wouldest forbear to help him, thou shalt surely help with him." The law of returning what doesn't belong to you to its rightful owner applied, not just to the fellow Israelite, not just to your friends, but ALSO to your ENEMIES. You could certainly keep something taken from your enemy in battle IF the Lord gave it to you. The Israelites entered the Promised Land and were to cast out all of the children of Canaan while taking their land. However, if your enemy's beasts of burden just wandered off, then you were under Divine obligation to return these animals back to their rightful owner. God alone has the right to give us wealth ... we must never TAKE wealth from someone else or harm another without the express direction of God. Our Lord Jesus Christ taught us another way: SUPPORTING ~ Luke 10:25 "And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? [26] He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou? [27] And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbor as thyself. [28] And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live. [29] But he, willing to justify himself, said unto Jesus, And who is my neighbor? [30] And Jesus answering said, A certain [man] went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded [him], and departed, leaving [him] half dead. [31] And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. [32] And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked [on him], and passed by on the other side. [33] But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion [on him], [34] And went to [him], and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him. [35] And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave [them] to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee. [36] Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbor unto him that fell among the thieves? [37] And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise." Our way, as believers, is the way of Christ, the way of Peace. John R. W. Stott said, "Jesus Christ is a peacemaker. So, if we want to be God's children and Christ's disciples, we must be peacemakers too." God's people are called to rely on God for their wealth - not chance - and to be peacemakers and stewards of the Gospel message. |
2. Dress codes (22:5).
A. God prohibited that men or women dressing like the opposite sex.1) This verse most likely is referring to illicit sexual practices--including homosexuality (Lev.18:22; 20:13)--are included in this prohibition.B. The adoption of clothing of the opposite sex was forbidden because it obscured the distinction of the sexes and thus violated an essential part of the created order of life (Gen.1:27).
2) The same Hebrew word translated here as "abomination" (to'ebah {to-ay-baw'}) is translated elsewhere as "detests" and is used to describe God's view of homosexuality (Lev. 18:22; 20:13).
3) There is some evidence that exists that transvestitism may have been connected with the ancient Canaanite worship of their gods.- The reference to "man's things," (i.e., "pertaineth unto a man," KJV) in the Hebrew (keliy {kel-ee'}) refers to anything that was commonly associated with men in that culture; such as implements, utensils, dress, vessels, weapons, furnishings, furniture, instruments, jewels, tools, whatsoever.
|
|
FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy
22:5 "The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither
shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination
unto the LORD thy God."
This verse has been over amplified and misapplied by Christians throughout the years. Some religious groups go so far as to forbid women from wearing slacks, shirts, or pocket watches because men also wear the same thing. Does the verse demand such restrictions? Matthew Henry states: "If we would prove ourselves to be God's people, we must have respect to his will and to his glory, and not to the vain fashions of the world. Even in putting on our garments, as in eating or in drinking, all must be done with a serious regard to preserve our own and others' purity in heart and actions. Our eye should be single, our heart simple, and our behavior all of a piece." In other words, our dress should be such that it honors God, and not the conventions of this world. I have seen "Paris Fashion Shows" parade up and down the walkway in alleged women's clothing that I wouldn't put on a monkey, much less a woman. Ugly designs that serve no purpose but to blur the distinctions between the sexes, outrageously promoted as the "in thing". As Paul would have said, "God forbid!". We who are believers should dress in such a way as to honor our Creator, who established a natural order of life in the Garden of Eden: SUPPORTING ~ Genesis 1:27 "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them." SUPPORTING ~ Genesis 5:1-2 "This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him; [2] Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created." God made Adam in two complementary parts: Adam, the first, the Federal Head of creation, and from out of Adam's rib Eve, his helper, his completion, his wife. This is the Lord's natural order in creation, man and wife working together in covenant with God. Since God established this order, God wants His followers to maintain that order in both BEHAVIOR as well as DRESS. Look at our text: FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy 22:5a "The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man ..." The word "pertaineth" is the Hebrew {kliy [kel-ee']}, which means "something prepared for" or "specifically designed for". This word emphasizes that the woman should not purposely cross-dress and wear clothing SPECIFICALLY designed for men. This could be suits, armor, instruments, etc. Though the specific item is not addressed, the sense of the verse is that the woman's intent is to DRESS SO AS TO BLUR the distinctions between the sexes. To do so would introduce confusion into the Divine Design, and would therefore be sinful. The text further states: FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy 22:5b "... neither shall a man put on a woman's garment .." The man, likewise, was to refuse to cross-dress in clothes specifically designed for women. To do so would, again, blur the Divinely Designed distinctions between the sexes, and would therefore be sinful. Some in our present age have pointed to Galatians 3:28, which says: SUPPORTING ~ Galatians 3:28 "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus." And have used this passage to justify cross dressing. They say, "The Cross removed all distinctions between the sexes, thus we are free to dress as we want to dress". Yet this verse does NOT refer to dress, but to STATUS before your Creator: we are ALL equally saved because of the Cross of Christ. But though we have equal status, Divine Design is NOT removed by the New Birth. The Jew, prior to salvation, is still of the same physical design after salvation. The male and female of our species still sport the same equipment, and still are to follow God's Design in our social activities one with another. Why should the believer avoid cross-dressing, that is, avoid dressing like a member of the opposite sex? In one of the most difficult passages in Scripture, 1 Corinthians 11:5-16, the Apostle Paul addresses the Corinthians on their apparent failure to maintain God's Design in dress. Though I will NOT discuss this text from the viewpoint of "long hair verses short hair", I would like to look at these four verses: SUPPORTING ~ 1 Corinthians 11:13-16 "Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered? [14] Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him? [15] But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering. [16] But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God." Now I know that "long" and "short" are relative terms for hair, based on the society you live in. I am a retired military non-commissioned officer, and I wear my hair short. I know others, though, who wear their hair even closer cut, and would consider my hair "long". As Paul said, "if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God". Let's not let this degrade into an argument on hair length, which defeats our lesson. Rather, focus on the CONDITION of the Corinthian Church. The Corinthians, who should have been spiritual, were CARNAL BABES in Christ (1 Corinthians 3:1). They scorned the great Apostle Paul, while following around after Apollos (1 Corinthians 4:6). They tolerated incest within the Church Body (1 Corinthians 5:1-5), and sued one another in court, holding Christ's Church up to open ridicule (1 Corinthians 6:1). They used the Temple Prostitutes of Corinth (1 Corinthians 6:18) to the dishonor of their own bodies, and cared little for the weaker members of the flock, adopting a "help yourself" philosophy (1 Corinthians 8). The Corinthian Church was, Scripturally, one of the saddest bunch of believers mentioned in the Bible. They wandered away from God's established order in both righteousness AND IN NATURE. After Paul admonished the Corinthians for cross-dressing (at least, insofar as the normal hairstyles of their society was concerned), he immediately rebuked the Corinthians for drunken and disorderly conduct at the Lord's Table (1 Corinthians 11:17-34). You see, if a person wanders away from the natural order of dress (and each of you knows in your heart what is acceptable and unacceptable dress for the man and woman), then it's just a small step from there to wander away from established order in Christ's Church OR Yeshua's Israel. Again, I do not want this section of Scripture to disintegrate into a discussion without end as to "what the proper length of a person's hair should be". If you are saved, the Spirit of God WILL guide you in such decisions. Yet the Deuteronomy text, along with the other passages we have studied, does recognize that our Lord Jesus created mankind with a certain Divinely established order - and we are to recognize that order and honor HIM in the way we dress and act. When we forget this truth we introduce abominable behavior into our society, and by our actions step on a slippery slope that could drag us down as far as the Corinthians went. |
3. Animal Life (22:6-7).
A. If an Israelite found a bird's nest with the mother sitting on her young, it is only permissible to take the young but not the mother bird.1) The most common nesting places were in trees or on the ground.B. Obeying God's laws would result in blessings (4:40; 5:16; 6:3,18; 12:25, 28; 19:13).
2) Moses was probably teaching the Israelites to protect this food source, and not necessarily how to "be kind to animals."
3) By letting the mother bird go they could anticipate the production of more young in the future.
|
|
FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy
22:6-7 "If a bird's nest chance to be before thee in the way in any tree,
or on the ground, whether they be young ones, or eggs, and the dam sitting
upon the young, or upon the eggs, thou shalt not take the dam with the
young: [7] But thou shalt in any wise let the dam go, and take the
young to thee; that it may be well with thee, and that thou mayest prolong
thy days."
The Lord now turns from the natural order among humankind and now examines the natural order in Creation. Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Biblically (and this is what I accept as true), the chicken came first, for God created them "male and female created He them". God made each part of His Creation capable of reproduction, and gave animals to man to be OUR FOOD in the Noahic Covenant: SUPPORTING ~ Genesis 9:1-3 "And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth. [2] And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth, and upon every fowl of the air, upon all that moveth upon the earth, and upon all the fishes of the sea; into your hand are they delivered. [3] Every MOVING THING THAT LIVETH SHALL BE MEAT for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things." Animal life, which is NOT made in God's image and does NOT have a human soul, was given to us for our use as food and clothing. Though PETA and the other animal rights groups would like to crush this truth, it is validated over and over again in the Scripture. Yet, even though animals are given to be our food, the Israelite was warned against GREED in the taking of this food. There MUST be management in taking wildlife. If the Israelite were to take both the eggs as well as the mother hen for food, then that hen would be unable to produce future young for Israel's nourishment. If this happened enough times, the species along with the food source would be eradicated - and Israel would suffer. The Christian, just like the Israelite, needs to maintain a balanced view of the Creation around us. We must learn to work WITHIN that Creation that Jesus made for us, not to allow GREED to lead to the extinction of a species. Our Lord has graciously provided us with all that we need to sustain life: SUPPORTING ~ Acts 14:17 "Nevertheless he left not himself without witness, in that he did good, and gave us rain from heaven, and fruitful seasons, filling our hearts with food and gladness." But we are called to be WISE STEWARDS with what He has provided. In America, the buffalo herds - once miles in diameter - were nearly extinguished by the greed of man. Meat was left rotting on the plains while the butchers tore the flesh from their carcasses for filthy lucre's sake. Whole tribes of American Native Indians starved while the white man slaughtered their source of food for money. God told His nation Israel, avoid such excesses. The Lord has provided plenty of food for us all, as long as we do not allow our greed to kill the goose that lays the golden egg; as long as we do not rape the land till it erodes into uselessness. |
4. Building codes (22:8).
A. When an Israelite built a new house they were to put a "parapet" (i.e., a wall or railing) around the top of their roof to keep anyone from falling off and killing themselves.1) The roof of a house in the ancient Near East was used for a variety of purposes.B. This law was concerned about the safety of others and it also emphasized again the value of human life.A) Samuel conversed with Saul on the roof and spent the night there (1 Sam. 9:25-26).2) Making a parapet on one's roof would help prevent someone from falling from the roof.
B) David was walking on the roof of the palace when he saw Bathsheba (2 Sam 11:2).
C) Absalom pitched a tent on a roof so that "lay with his father's concubines in the sight of all Israel" (2 Sam 16:22).
|
|
FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy
22:8 "When thou buildest a new house, then thou shalt make a battlement
for thy roof, that thou bring not blood upon thine house, if any man fall
from thence."
Just as God regulated the taking of animal life for sustenance, He also regulated the building codes in Israel. Why? Because in all instances, Yeshua loved and continues to love His people, be they of Israel or of the Church. In fact, He so loved the WORLD that: SUPPORTING ~ 2 Peter 3:9 "The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is long-suffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance." SUPPORTING ~ Mark 8:35 "For whosoever will save his life shall lose it; but whosoever shall lose his life for my sake and the gospel's, the same shall save it." This great love of God, this great love for human life, is reflected in the fact that He wanted His people to make safe structures in which to live. The Israelite often used the roof of their houses as gardens, and often used these gardens to sleep in during the summer time or entertain guests. Because of this the Lord wanted a {ma`aqeh [mah-ak-eh']}, a parapet or railing placed around the edge of the roof. Jamieson-Faucett-Brown states: "The tops of houses in ancient Judea, as in the East still, were flat, being composed of branches or twigs laid across large beams, and covered with a cement of clay or strong plaster. They were surrounded by a parapet breast high. In summer the roof is a favorite resort for coolness, and accidents would frequently happen from persons incautiously approaching the edge and falling into the street or court; hence it was a wise and prudent precaution in the Jewish legislator to provide that a stone balustrade or timber railing round the roof should form an essential part of every new house." Contrary to what many believe and Cain the murderer proposed, we ARE our brother's keeper. Within the nation laws are established NOT to restrict our freedom, but to enhance our safety and increase our life span. Though I know many Christians who rebel against the seat belt laws and refuse to buckle up, these laws are just as valid as the "railing around the roof" law in Israel. When people are hurt in any society because of laziness, irresponsibility, or recklessness, the entire nation bears the burden. GOD VALUES human life, and expects us to do the same. The behavior of each person has a cumulative effect that impacts our society, impacts our community, and disturbs the order of the nation. Our Lord recognized the right of the nation to order the affairs of its citizens when He said: SUPPORTING ~ Matthew 22:17-21 "Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not? [18] But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites? [19] Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny. [20] And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? [21] They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's." The Apostle Paul, under the inspiration of God the Holy Spirit, reiterated this truth when he said: SUPPORTING ~ Romans 13:3-7 "For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: [4] For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil. [5] Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake. [6] For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God's ministers, attending continually upon this very thing. [7] Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honor to whom honor." The national entity has the RIGHT to legislate and establish laws for the protection of its citizenry. Just as God established building codes for the safety of the Israelite, He does the same thing today for humanity through the national government. We are to therefore obey these Laws, even if they seem petty, for OUR OWN GOOD. |
5. Prohibition against mixtures (22:9-11).
A. The Israelites were prohibited from planting two types of seeds in a field, yoking an ox and a donkey together for plowing and weaving wool and linen together.1) The reason for these prohibitions is uncertain.A) They may have had a symbolic function in teaching the Israelites something about the created order or these mixtures may reflect certain pagan cultic practices.2) These prohibitions of mixing expand slightly on Leviticus 19:19.
B) Perhaps the idea is that the distinctions that God ordained in Creation are to be preserved and that Israelite behavior was to be differentiated from that of its neighbors.
|
|
FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy
22:9-11 "Thou shalt not sow thy vineyard with divers seeds: lest the fruit
of thy seed which thou hast sown, and the fruit of thy vineyard, be defiled.
[10] Thou shalt not plow with an ox and an ass together. [11]
Thou shalt not wear a garment of divers sorts, as of woolen and linen together."
As we look at these verses we are immediately troubled, but as we delve deeper we find a greater truth that comforts us. Here is the troubling part: WHY did God specify such restrictions? Is there a logical reason for such injunctions? Perhaps. Perhaps the Lord told the Israelites to not sow different types of seed in a garden plot to teach them that there is a natural order in creation. Perhaps the reason that the ox and the jackass were not to be used to plow the same garden was to prevent cross contamination between the animals, the soil, and the crop. Perhaps a blend of wool and linen would not last as long as a purely wool or purely linen article of clothing. Perhaps that's the reason. Or perhaps, and this is my belief, the Lord just wanted His children to hear what He said and DO IT because HE said it. Over the past twenty-five years I have encountered truths in Scripture that I could not explain with my rational mind. Whole societies of Christians have grown up around Theological debates without end and without purpose - while the world desperately needs to hear the simple Gospel of Christ. On June 20-24 of 2001, a ABC NEWS/ Belief net poll was conducted by telephone among a random national sample of 1,022 adults. The poll asked, "What, if anything, is your religion?". Of those asked, eighty-three percent of Americans identify themselves as Christians. Most of the rest, 13 percent, have no religion. That leaves just 4 percent as adherents of all non-Christian religions combined - Jews, Muslims, Buddhists and a smattering of individual mentions. Strange, isn't it, that a nation allegedly composed of 85% of Christians could have the highest murder rate, highest crime rate, and highest decadence of any nation in the world. What this proves is that many have taken the name "Christian", but are not. They have no personal relationship with Jesus Christ. They do not know God the Father, nor are they indwelt with God the Holy Spirit. If we are Christians, then we are FOLLOWERS of Jesus Christ. We do as He says, whether we understand it or not. The Israelite may not have understood why God wanted them to avoid mixing seed, plowing with mixed animals, or wearing mixed or composite clothing - but the Lord wanted them to do it whether they understood it or not. Though I am not under the Law of Moses, I am under the Law of the Spirit. Like a child at the dinner table, I do not know all things. I may not know how this food was provided, or understand why it was provided - but as He leads me, I must follow. Understanding will come later. Now, right now, Jesus demands obedience. |
6. Tassels on garments (22:12).
- The Israelites were to tie tassels on the four corners of their garments to remind them to obey the Law (Num.15:37-41).
Application: The
laws that were given here for the life-style in the Land of Promise went
far beyond rules to control wrongdoing. It dealt with the issues of being
actively involved with your fellow citizen's and demanded that assistance
was to be given without any expectation of monetary rewards. These laws
also showed God's desire to maintain the order of His creation and His
concern for human life, and that our lives should daily reflect upon His
ways.
III. Laws Concerning Sexual Immorality (22:13-30).
1. The charge of not being a virgin (22:13-21).
A. This law was meant to enforce premarital sexual purity and to encourage parents to instill within their children the value of sexual purity.2. Various laws are given for men lying with women (22:22-29).
B. An unscrupulous husband might try to misuse the law against his wife for personal reasons, or perhaps to recover the bride-price he originally paid to the girl's father.1) If a husband charged that his wife was not a virgin when they were married then her parents were obligated to produce proof of her virginity (vv.15-17).A) The evidence was to be bloodstained garment or a bed sheet from the wedding night.2) If the parents provide evidence of her virginity then the man making the false charge was to be punished (vv.18-20).
B) Records from various cultures in the ancient Near East refer to this kind of evidence being made public.A) If the man was guilty of defaming his bride, he must give a hundred shekels of silver to the girl's father, and she remained as his wife; he was never to divorce her (vv.18-19).(1) 100 shekels of silver was double the original bride-price (v. 29 seems to indicate that 50 shekels was the usual bride-price).B) If no acceptable proof of the girl's virginity was presented, she was to be stoned to death at the door of her father's house (vv.20-21).
(2) The fine was given to the girl's father because he too was slandered by the accusation which called into question his desire or ability to pass on to his children God's values regarding sexual purity.
(3) The man forfeited his right to ever divorce her (v.19).(1) This harsh punishment was not only intended for the sin of fornication (being promiscuous) but also for lying to her prospective husband, which implicated her father in the deception.
(2) This evil too was to be purged from the nation (vv.22, 24; 13:5).
A. Adultery is not only forbidden but, was a capital offense that demanded the death penalty (v.22).1) Neither here nor in Leviticus 18:20, 29, and 20:10 is the precise manner in which it was to be carried out specified.
2) In Mesopotamia an adulterous couple was bound and thrown into the water (Code of Hammurabi. Law 129), though no extant court records from Mesopotamia indicate that this penalty was ever enforced.
3) During the time of Christ, it was interpreted that the penalty for adultery was death by stoning (John 8:5).
4) Later Rabbinic tradition prescribed death by strangulation.
|
|
FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy
22:22-24 "If a man be found lying with a woman married to an husband,
then they shall both of them die, both the man that lay with the woman,
and the woman: so shalt thou put away evil from Israel. [23] If a
damsel that is a virgin be betrothed unto an husband, and a man find her
in the city, and lie with her; [24] Then ye shall bring them
both out unto the gate of that city, and ye shall stone them with stones
that they die; the damsel, because she cried not, being in the city; and
the man, because he hath humbled his neighbor's wife: so thou shalt put
away evil from among you."
God considered monogamy to be His Divine standard in marriage, and if a person, man or woman, stepped outside of this standard to commit adultery, then they were put to death. This was NOT a one sided verdict, for BOTH parties to the adultery were executed. If a woman was caught in the act of adultery she could not claim "it was rape" and thus escape sentence, for if she was raped she should have cried out. If she was raped, and cried out, she was set free - she had done no evil. SUPPORTING ~ John 8:5-11 "Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou? [6] This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not. [7] So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her. [8] And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground. [9] And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst. [10]When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee? [11] She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more." When Jesus allowed the woman taken in adultery to go free, He was not condoning her act of sin but was following His Law to the letter. If the woman had been "caught in the act" of adultery, then by the Law both the woman AS WELL AS her companion were to be executed. Though Jesus never said it specifically, He knew that the woman's companion was not there - and that the charge leveled against her was therefore unjust. He then quietly wrote in the dust and waited for their consciences to remind them of the intent of the Law, which was that ALL the guilty parties had to be punished. Once the accusers went away, there were no witnesses present to condemn the woman as required by the Law. Thus Jesus told the woman, "Go and sin no more". In our society we have winked at sexual sin for so long that it no longer seems to be a big deal to us. We all need to be reminded, it IS a big deal to God. Jesus did not make light of the adulteresses activities, but on the same hand was not going to allow His Law to be used frivolously. Sexual impropriety is just as destructive to the person, to the family, and to the nation as it has always been. Once we become accustomed to one shocking sexual revelation, we then start looking for something even greater to titillate us. It is a fact that sexual abuses and excesses lead to ever greater sexual abuses and excesses. The father of the Canaanites (Genesis 9:23-24) started out by watching his father sleeping naked, and this seed eventual became seven nations that were so horrible that God wanted them destroyed from the land. The starting point: simple titillation. The ending point: child sacrifice, orgies, murder. |
B. A virgin pledged to be married was to be treated like a married woman (vv.23-27).3. Marriage to Stepmother (22:30).1) An engaged Jewish girl was considered to be a man's wife (Deut.22:24).C. A man who raped an un-betrothed virgin was forced to marry her (vv.28-29).
2) It was to be assumed that the sexual union which took place in a town was not rape but adultery if the girl had not screamed for help (vv.23-24).- If it had been a case of rape her screams for help would have been heard whether or not she could have been rescued.3) If the assault occurred out in the country, then the betrothed girl was given the benefit of doubt and only the man was put to death (vv.25-27).- Rape was considered as serious as murder and therefore deserving of death.4) If he lies with an engaged woman in a city they must both be stoned: the girl because she did not cry out and the man for violating his neighbor.1) The man had to pay the father the bride-price of 50 shekels.
2) The man forfeited his right of divorce.A) This protected, to a degree, the girl's honor and assured her and her child if she became pregnant from the rape which provided permanent support.
B) This also may have served as a deterrent against rape since the man would have to live with that woman for the rest of his life.
A. A man may not marry his stepmother after his father had died since that would be a dishonor of his father's authority.
B. Such a marriage would have been regarded as incestuous (Lev. 18:7-8).1) Leviticus 20:11 condemns both of them to death.
2) This sin was condemned on Mount Ebal (Deut.27:20).
3) This sin was committed by a man in the church at Corinth (1 Cor.5).
Application: Sexual
purity of a woman was important in Israel because it helped to maintain
the family line, name and property. These standards helped to prevent an
illegitimate son from entering the family and keep the family rights intact.
God's design for sexual relationships has always been marriage, and when
we go outside those boundaries we open ourselves up to all kinds of problems
spiritually, physically, and mentally.
Bible Study Outline
"Moses' Second Address: Laws
Concerning Israel's Congregational Life"
Deuteronomy 23:1-14
Lesson 23
by Joseph M. Willmouth
These Outlines were prepared for our Sunday Evening Bible
Study, as a 2 page handout (front & back -- & sometimes a little
longer), at
Trinity Bible Church, Biloxi, Mississippi.
I. The Assembly Of The Lord.
1. The elders called an assembly for variety of reasons.
A. Every circumcised Israelite was a member of the congregation.
B. The congregation was subdivided into the tribe and then the most basic unit, the family.
C. The congregation of Israel functioned in military, legal, punishment, and annual feasts matters.
2. During the assembly, the religious community undertook
various sacred rites (4:10; 9:10; 10:4; 18:16).
II. The Exclusion Of Eunuchs And Illegitimate Children (vv.1-2).
1. Men who's reproductive organs that were mutilated (damaged or missing) were not allowed in the assembly (v.1).
A. Priests who had similar defects were prohibited from serving at the alter, although they could eat of the holy food (Lev.21:16-23).2. Those who were born illegitimately were excluded (v.2).
B. This exclusion may have been a reminder that mutilation of the body was unacceptable to God (14:1-2).1) This prohibition may not have been intended for a person who was accidentally castrated.
2) Or it may have been directed to the person who purposefully had himself castrated for pagan religious purposes.
A. The meaning of the phrase is uncertain.
B. Traditionally it has been thought to refer to a child born out of wedlock, but it could very well only refer to a child born from a incestuous relationship, or from a cult prostitute.
C. Many rabbis interpret this to mean a child born of a forbidden marriage (i.e., Israelite married to an Ammonite).
D. This punishment was to help to deter Israelites from entering into ungodly relationships.
|
|
FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy
23:1-2 "He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy member cut
off, shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD. [2] A bastard
shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation
shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD. "
The "congregation of the Lord" {qahal [kaw-hawl'], assembly} was convened by the elders of the tribe to commit various sacred rites or acts of worship before God, as well as to discuss and prepare for war. In this section several categories of people are excluded from the Assembly: 1. Men whose reproductive organs were wounded or damaged. In ancient pagan religions the reproductive organs were pierced or mutilated in order to satisfy a false god. Most scholars do not feel that the restriction against "He that is wounded in the stones" refers to men who were damaged accidentally or in battle, but the injunction was against those who had a background in pagan worship. God despises idolatry, and considers those who follow after its practice to be abominable. Idolatry cost Israel the Promised Land time and time again: SUPPORTING ~ Ezekiel 33:24-29 "Son of man, they that inhabit those wastes of the land of Israel speak, saying, Abraham was one, and he inherited the land: but we are many; the land is given us for inheritance. [25] Wherefore say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Ye eat with the blood, and lift up your eyes toward your idols, and shed blood: and shall ye possess the land? [26] Ye stand upon your sword, ye work abomination, and ye defile every one his neighbour's wife: and shall ye possess the land? [27] Say thou thus unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; As I live, surely they that are in the wastes shall fall by the sword, and him that is in the open field will I give to the beasts to be devoured, and they that be in the forts and in the caves shall die of the pestilence. [28] For I will lay the land most desolate, and the pomp of her strength shall cease; and the mountains of Israel shall be desolate, that none shall pass through. [29] Then shall they know that I am the LORD, when I have laid the land most desolate because of all their abominations which they have committed." Idolatry scars the soul, destroys life, causes the believer to forfeit his God given blessings. The second injunction against, 2. Illegitimate children are also a result of idolatry. {mamzer [mam-zare']}, meaning "a child born out of wedlock, or born from incest", could also refer to children who were the offspring of pagan temple prostitutes. When a man or a woman considers their pleasure and self gratification to be greater than God's command for our lives, then our own bodies become somewhat of an idol. Many people have the idea that "it's my body, and I'm not hurting anyone when I'm promiscuous". This is not true. Our actions always have consequences, and those consequences may hurt the innocent around us. Though the illegitimate child did nothing to deserve it, and though the fault was his promiscuous parents, he was barred from being in the congregation of the Lord, along with the nine generations that followed him. This was very sad, but the Lord wanted to teach Israel that NOTHING we do is done in a vacuum. When we deliberately sin against God, there are consequences for that sin - and the innocent often suffer along with the guilty because of our hard heartedness. David's sin of adultery killed the innocent and righteous Uriah, Cain killed his brother Abel and broke his mother's heart twice, Abraham pretended Sarah was his sister, and nearly caused her dishonor, Daniel went into captivity with his nation, though he had done no evil. Under the Law God refused to allow those who were "blemished" by sin (either because of their own doing, or because of someone else's action) to enter into the Congregation of the Lord. Worship and participation in the Theocracy of Israel was a PRIVILEGE not to be taken for granted. As members of the Body of Christ under the New Covenant, we should be thankful that physical blemishes or past indiscretions do not bar us from salvation by faith in Christ. One of my favorite passages of Scripture is in: SUPPORTING ~ Acts 8. 26-39 "And the angel of the Lord spake unto Philip, saying, Arise, and go toward the south unto the way that goeth down from Jerusalem unto Gaza, which is desert. [27] And he arose and went: and, behold, a man of Ethiopia, an eunuch of great authority under Candace queen of the Ethiopians, who had the charge of all her treasure, and had come to Jerusalem for to worship, [28] Was returning, and sitting in his chariot read Esaias the prophet. [29] Then the Spirit said unto Philip, Go near, and join thyself to this chariot. [30] And Philip ran thither to [him], and heard him read the prophet Esaias, and said, Understandest thou what thou readest? [31] And he said, How can I, except some man should guide me? And he desired Philip that he would come up and sit with him. [32] The place of the scripture which he read was this, He was led as a sheep to the slaughter; and like a lamb dumb before his shearer, so opened he not his mouth: [33] In his humiliation his judgment was taken away: and who shall declare his generation? for his life is taken from the earth. [34] And the eunuch answered Philip, and said, I pray thee, of whom speaketh the prophet this? of himself, or of some other man? [35] Then Philip opened his mouth, and began at the same scripture, and preached unto him Jesus. [36] And as they went on [their] way, they came unto a certain water: and the eunuch said, See, [here is] water; what doth hinder me to be baptized? [37] And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. [38] And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him. [39] And when they were come up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip, that the eunuch saw him no more: and he went on his way rejoicing." |
3. Many believe that the reference "to the tenth generation," means as long as the nation exists (vv.2-3).
Application: The
Deuteronomic prohibitions, often if not always, relate in some way to the
religious differences between Israelites under the Lord's covenant and
the pagan nations of Canaan. Today we can be grateful that physical blemishes
and limitations are not a barrier to faith in Jesus Christ and participation
in the blessings of the New Covenant (Acts 8:26-39;
Warren
Wiersbe).
III. The Exclusion Of Ammonite And Moabite Men (vv.3-6).
1. Ammonites and Moabites were excluded from the assembly of the Lord because they failed to show concern for the Israelites when they moved toward Canaan (vv.3-5).
A. The Ammonites and Moabites were descended from Lot as a result of the incestuous union with his daughters (Gen.19:30-38).2. Israel as a nation was never to seek peace or good relations with these two nations (v.6; Ezra 9:12).
B. Israel had sought nothing from either Ammon or Moab except the right to purchase food and water (2:28-29).1) Israel skirted their lands and, at the express direction of the Lord, showed no hostility toward them (2:9, 16-19).A) The act of the king is naturally the responsibility of the whole kingdom because he represents and acts for the people.
2) Moab hired Balaam to curse Israel; and even though the Lord turned the curse to blessing, Moab came under the indictment of not supporting the Israelites.
B) Balaam son of Beor was a northwest Mesopotamian sorcerer who was compelled by the Lord to bless rather than to curse Israel (v. 5; Num 22-24).
C. This appears to be the failure of showing brotherly love based on the blessing to Abraham beginning in Genesis 12:3.
A. This statement was a prohibition against making any treaty of friendship or mutual assistance.
B. The prophets also denounced the Ammonites and Moabites (Isa 15:1-16:13; Jer 48:1-49:6; Ezek 21:28-32; 25:3-4; Zeph 2:8-9).
C. Because these nations were related to Israel, God did not permit the Jews to attack them.
D. There did seem a couple of notable exceptions to this prohibition.1) Ruth was a Moabitess who was accepted in Israel and whose descendants included the Davidic line eventuating in the Messiah.A) This may have been due to her attitude about making Naomi's God, her God (Ruth 1:16).2) Some of David's mighty men were Ammonites and Moabites (1 Chron.11:39, 46).
B) Isaiah seemed to have held a similar view but he may have been speaking of only the end times (Isa.56:3, 6-8).
3) Some think that the rules of exclusion only apply to the males and which would not apply to Ruth then.
|
|
FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy
23:3-6 "An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation
of the LORD; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter into the
congregation of the LORD for ever: [4] Because they met you not with
bread and with water in the way, when ye came forth out of Egypt; and because
they hired against thee Balaam the son of Beor of Pethor of Mesopotamia,
to curse thee. [5] Nevertheless the LORD thy God would not hearken
unto Balaam; but the LORD thy God turned the curse into a blessing unto
thee, because the LORD thy God loved thee. [6] Thou shalt not seek
their peace nor their prosperity all thy days for ever."
3. Finally, The Ammonites and Moabites were not allowed in the Congregation of the Lord because of their evil toward God's people. The Ammonites were inhospitable, and attacked Israel as she fled Egypt - and thus were barred, and the Moabites were responsible for trying to get Balaam to curse Israel (Numbers 22-24). Further, both Ammonites and Moabites were descendents of the incestuous union of Lot and his daughters (Genesis 19.30-38). Clarke's Commentary states: "These nations were subjected for their impiety and wickedness, (see #De 23:4, 5|,) to peculiar disgrace, and on this account were not permitted to hold any office among the Israelites. But this did not disqualify them from being proselytes: Ruth, who was a Moabitess, was married to Boaz, and she became one of the progenitors of our Lord." |
Application: These
verses speak volumes about how God views those nations or people who show
hostility or disdain for His people. Just because someone mistreats us
doesn't give us the right to declare war on them either. Be careful how
you treat people, because is watching!
IV. The Inclusion Of Edomites And The Egyptians (vv.7-8).
1. The treatment of the Edomite and Egyptian people was to be more lenient.
A. The Edomites were descended from Esau (Gen.25:24-26; 36:43).2. The third generation of these peoples could enter "the assembly of the Lord."
B. The Egyptians.1) They were also protected from the harsh judgment, perhaps because of Israel's long stay in that country and the initial good treatment given to Joseph and his family when they first entered Egypt (Gen.37-50).
2) Egyptians also received Jacob and his family in their land and cared for them (Gen.46-47).
A. Though Edomites and Egyptians also failed in their kindness toward Israel, and even oppressed her, these two nations were not to be despised.Application: These verses teach us that God will show kindness to those who show kindness to His own people. This doesn't mean that they earn their salvation, but only that He will show mercy on them in their lives. Acts of kindness, no matter how big or small, will ever go unnoticed and unrewarded by God.
B. The great grandchildren of the then current population could be integrated into the assembly of the Lord.
V. Maintaining The Purity Of The Military Assembly (vv.9-14).
1. This section covers the rules for the holiness and cleanliness of the camp during military engagements, especially since the Israelites were soon to enter the land of Canaan (v.9).
A. Moses directs the Israelites to be pure in the military camp.2. Nocturnal emissions (vv.10-11).
B. This legislation deals with matters of personal hygiene, emphasizing the close relationship between cleanliness and godliness, or God's presence.
A. This may refer to semen as described in Leviticus 15:16-17.3. Disposal of human waste (vv.12-13).
B. It could also apply to a man who urinates in the camp at night because he is too tired to get up and go outside the camp.
C. The man who became unclean at night was required to stay outside the camp the following day, but could return after sunset if he washed himself first (v.11).
A. The men were to leave the camp and go to a designated area to use the "rest room" (v.12).4. The reason for these commands (v.14).
B. They were to dig a hole and bury their waste (v.13).
A. This verse gives the reason for maintaining of the purity within the camp.Application:John Maxwell gives four observations from this passage:1) The presence of God is everywhere, and He observes our behavior even during our most private moments; 2) Our most mundane acts are significant and can be an honor or dishonor to God; 3) The pressures of life or war are not an excuse for a lower standard of living; and 4) God is concerned about cleanliness and hygiene, and His laws are for our protection so that we can live a better life.
B. God walked in the midst of the camp to protect His people and to deliver their enemies into their hands, so the camp was to remain undefiled so that God would not depart.1) The symbol of His presence in the camp of the ark of the covenant.
2) In the presence of the ark no unholy thing would be tolerated.
Bible Study Outline
"Moses' Second Address:
Miscellaneous
Laws - Part I"
Deuteronomy 23:15-25
Lesson 24
by Joseph M. Willmouth
These Outlines were prepared for our Sunday Evening Bible
Study, as a 2 page handout (front & back -- & sometimes a little
longer), at
Trinity Bible Church, Biloxi, Mississippi.
I. Fugitive Slaves (23:15-16).
1. When a fugitive slave from another country escaped and sought asylum in Israel they were not to turn them over to their masters (v.15).
A. This was contrary to ancient Near Eastern practice.2. Once a foreign slave found asylum in Israel they were free to go anywhere within the domain of Israel (v.16).1) According to the Hammurabi Code, a man who harbored a runaway slave was to be put to death.B. Treaties of that day included provisions for escaped slaves and other fugitives to be returned.
2) Hammurabi (ha moo-ra' bi) Code.A) Hammurabi was the king of Babylonia (1792-1750 B.C.).
B) His code of laws is one of the greatest of ancient codes.(1) It is carved on a diorite (di-o-rite; a dark-gray or greenish igneous rock) column, in 3,600 lines of cuneiform (ku-ni-form; lit. wedge-shaped characters).
(2) The laws are generally humanitarian, but has a serve feature of being retributive in nature by punishing people literally following a "eye-for-an-eye."
Application: This
command helped the Israelites depend upon God rather than treaties with
other countries. It also served to remind Israel that they too had
once be slaves and were oppressed (Ex.22:21; Lev.19:33-34).
This passage is a good example how God show mercies to those who have been
enslaved and oppressed. God's design for mankind wasn't slavery,
but freedom. It is because of man's sin nature that any kind of slavery
existed, but God's grace is the answer to man's sin.
II. Temple Prostitutes (23:17-18).
1. Temple prostitution was practiced among Baal worshipers of Canaan in their fertility rites so God strictly forbid Israel to indulge in this demoralizing practice (v.17).
A. Temple prostitution was common in the Near East religions.2. The earnings of prostitutes are tainted and are not to be offered to pay any vow to the Lord (v.18).1) This command was to prevent the practice of a foreign religion by Israel and it kept the worship of the Lord from being contaminated.B. Young Israelite men and women were forbidden from becoming cult prostitutes.
2) Israel's history is filled with examples of their failure to obey this law (1 Kings 14:24; 15:12; 22:46; 2 Kings 23:7; Hos.4:14).
A. A "vow" covers any contributions promised to the Lord which allowed an Israelite to express his gratitude for God's gracious provision in his life.
B. To use money that had been acquired by sinful means would be hypocritical.
C. The term "dog" was normally used as a term of contempt (1 Sam. 17:43) and self-abasement (1 Sam. 24:15).1) The exact meaning of "the wages of a dog" is disputed.
2) It could refer to the dog-like manner in which one of these temple prostitutes debased themselves.
Application: John
Maxwell states of this verse, "Whatever
is acquired by evil means as well as what is evil in itself is not to be
offered to the Lord. Such things do not belong in the house of the Lord;
nor are they acceptable to him." God doesn't need sin-earned
money nor does He want it.
III. Lending Money (23:19-20).
1. The Israelites were not permitted to charge interest on anything that they loaned to their fellow Israelites (v.19; Ex. 22:25; Lev. 25:35-38).
A. Because of Israel's experience of deliverance from slavery, her moral code, gave special care to poor people (Ex. 22:21-24; Deut. 10:19; Ps. 82:3-4; Prov. 31:8-9).1) This rule alleviated the plight of the poor and made it more possible for them to work themselves out of their low estate.B. Because the earth was God's and human possessions were gifts from God, lending was sharing God's gifts (Lev. 25:23; Deut.10:14; 8:1-10).
2) Loans were to be acts of generosity, were not to be acts for profit at the poor's expense (Lev. 25:35-37).
|
Riches and Righteousness |
FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy
23:19-20 "Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother; usury
of money, usury of victuals, usury of any thing that is lent upon usury:
[20] Unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon usury; but unto thy brother
thou shalt not lend upon usury: that the LORD thy God may bless thee in
all that thou settest thine hand to in the land whither thou goest to possess
it."
The Israelite was forbidden to charge "usury" neshek {neh'-shek}, or interest, to his fellow Israelite. This rule extended to all things: money, food, anything... if it was loaned to a "brother", it was to be loaned interest free. There were several reasons for this. First, God has always taught that what was important to Him is the relationships that we have with Him, and with our fellow believers. It seems like so few people understand this today, but our Lord Jesus repeatedly taught RELATIONSHIP over RELIGION. We were to: SUPPORTING ~ Mark 12:30-31 "And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment. [31] And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these." Love Godward, and love manward. If you love Godward then you will DO HIS WILL, for love toward God entail obedience. If you love manward, then the relationship you have within the Family of God will be more important than the relationship that you have with, well, with money! The Israelite should have certainly understood this principle. They came from a background of slavery and poverty, and they were brothers and sisters together in the same lousy brick making duty that all Egyptian slaves were obligated to do. Just as the African American today has his roots in the injustice of slavery, the Jew, too, was enslaved, impoverished, debased. Thus God called all of these, His children freed, to remember that they were once in a destitute state - and in remembering to refuse to stoop to being the taskmaster. The second reason that the Father forbade the Israelite to charge interest to one another was because, just as it is with us, what they had, they had by the Grace of God. Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ thought very little of money. As a matter of fact, I find it interesting that, of all the disciples, the "Treasurer" of that little poor band of believers was Judas, the betrayer of Christ. When anyone begins to consider money or possessions to be greater than the relationship we have Godward / manward, then that individual is walking on a slippery slope. Jesus said of the wealthy young man who followed after Him: SUPPORTING ~ Matthew 19:21-24 "Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me. [22] But when the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful: for he had great possessions. [23] Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven. [24] And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God." The person who is well off, comfortable, often forgets that the riches he is so fond of are but fleeting things. We have all seen rich and wealthy people, beautiful people, powerful and wealthy people quickly dismiss Jesus in favor of comfort or satisfaction. It is a fact that those who are the wealthiest people in America, those who are in the television and movie production, these people are most prone to dismiss our Lord as just a "great teacher", a fine human, much as Mohammed was. The rich man always thinks that he has until tomorrow to think about God, if at all. God calls such a person a "fool": SUPPORTING ~ Luke 12:16-21 "And he spake a parable unto them, saying, The ground of a certain rich man brought forth plentifully: [17] And he thought within himself, saying, What shall I do, because I have no room where to bestow my fruits? [18] And he said, This will I do: I will pull down my barns, and build greater; and there will I bestow all my fruits and my goods. [19] And I will say to my soul, Soul, thou hast much goods laid up for many years; take thine ease, eat, drink, and be merry. [20] But God said unto him, Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee: then whose shall those things be, which thou hast provided? [21] So is he that layeth up treasure for himself, and is not rich toward God." for our lives are but fleeting, whereas an eternity in Hell ... now, that's a thought that I don't even want to dwell on! Riches lead the unbeliever far away from the arms of God, while making him insensitive to the needs of the poor around him. Consider the rich man and Lazarus. Some say this was a fable, a parable, but I don't think so - because things like this happen on a regular basis among the rich. The poor are objects, things to be used or ignored, just as Lazarus was ignored and used. The third reason God forbade the Israelite to charge interest to his brother was because we who are believers are ALWAYS given money so we can bless others with it. Paul told the Church at Corinth: SUPPORTING ~ 1 Corinthians 16:1-3 "Now concerning the collection for the saints, as I have given order to the churches of Galatia, even so do ye. [2] Upon the first day of the week let every one of you lay by him in store, as God hath prospered him, that there be no gatherings when I come. [3] And when I come, whomsoever ye shall approve by your letters, them will I send to bring your liberality unto Jerusalem." "Liberal" is a good word in the Bible when it refers to a person's desire to give to those in need. Contrary to popular belief in Christian circles, the believer is not under the standard of the Law for giving. We are not "required" to give a tithe, or ten percent, of our income to God's Work. You will never see the Apostles refer to a tithe as a standard of giving, and our Lord Jesus referred to the tithe in His teaching to the Orthodox Jews, the Pharisees. What are we, as Church Age believers to give? MUCH MORE, my friend, much more than a measly tithe. We are to give "as God hath prospered him". You see, God gives to the believer so the believer can turn around and give of that bounty to others in need. This giving is not limited to a percentage, but is as God lays on your heart: SUPPORTING ~ 2 Corinthians 9:5-12 "Therefore I thought it necessary to exhort the brethren, that they would go before unto you, and make up beforehand your bounty, whereof ye had notice before, that the same might be ready, as a matter of bounty, and not as of covetousness. [6] But this I say, He which soweth sparingly shall reap also sparingly; and he which soweth bountifully shall reap also bountifully. [7] Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver. [8] And God is able to make all grace abound toward you; that ye, always having all sufficiency in all things, may abound to every good work: [9] (As it is written, He hath dispersed abroad; he hath given to the poor: his righteousness remaineth for ever. [10] Now he that ministereth seed to the sower both minister bread for your food, and multiply your seed sown, and increase the fruits of your righteousness;) [11] Being enriched in every thing to all bountifulness, which causeth through us thanksgiving to God. [12] For the administration of this service not only supplieth the want of the saints, but is abundant also by many thanksgivings unto God" God gives to the believer, and as He gives to us, so should we give to others. Not grudgingly, thinking it is our money, because its not. The money, though we may labor for it, comes because of His Grace, without which we would be jobless and destitute ourselves. We do not give grudgingly, NOR OF NECESSITY. It is not a Law with us, not a Law written in stone, that we give a certain amount to our Lord's work. We give as the Spirit of God leads us, and give as the Lord has prospered us. When we give as He has given, "God is able to make all grace abound toward you". As we give of His bounty, the Lord provides more bounty so that we can further give. This is the believer's way of life. Not clutching money so hard the green runs out of it, but allowing God's standard of Grace to be reflected in everything we do ... because we love both Godward and manward. The Israelite as well as the Christian must learn that (1 John 2:17) "... the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever." FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy 23:20a "Unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon usury" ... The Israelite WAS allowed to loan money at interest to the "foreigner" {nokriy [nok-ree']}, the "outlander" or person not resident in Israel. This arrangement was NOT meant to be exploitive, though. The Israelite was not allowed to charge an unjust interest rate (such as the Credit Card companies do today), but only a fair rate for money lent. Further, the Israelite was NOT allowed to : SUPPORTING ~ Leviticus 19:33-37 "And if a stranger sojourn with thee in your land, ye shall not vex him. [34] But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God. [35] Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment, in mete yard, in weight, or in measure. [36] Just balances, just weights, a just ephah, and a just hin, shall ye have: I am the LORD your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt. [37] Therefore shall ye observe all my statutes, and all my judgments, and do them: I am the LORD." charge interest to the RESIDENT FOREIGNER in Israel. The Bible says that "the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself". Those who were traveling through Israel could be charged interest on money lent, but those who were resident, or living among the Israelites, were to be treated EXACTLY like they were Israelites. They were not to be charged interest, but loved "as thyself". Why? Because the Lord blessed Israel, though she was a stranger in bondage to Egypt, and just as HE GAVE TO ISRAEL He wanted Israel to give to the stranger living in her midst. There's that principle again: as God has given you, so shall you give. Our Lord and His ways do not change. We change, but not what He considers righteous. We make too much of money, and too little of those who were created in the image of God. We make entirely too much of our Church buildings, our pews, our great facilities, and too little of the people IN that building who are truly the Church of Christ. What's more important to God? This ... SUPPORTING ~ Exodus 22:25-27 "If thou lend money to any of my people that is poor by thee, thou shalt not be to him as an usurer, neither shalt thou lay upon him usury. [26] If thou at all take thy neighbor's raiment to pledge, thou shalt deliver it unto him by that the sun goeth down: [27] For that is his covering only, it is his raiment for his skin: wherein shall he sleep? and it shall come to pass, when he crieth unto me, that I will hear; for I am gracious." And as God is gracious, so are we who believe in Him should be. God is watching. Jesus sees us! |
2. The Israelites were permitted to charge interest to foreigners (v.20a).
A. Since merchants from other nations might come for business reasons to Israel, or make loans on interest to Israelites, foreigners could be charged interest3. The Lord's blessing on their labors in the land they were about to enter was contingent on their following this directive.1) This arrangement was not meant to be exploitative (Ex. 22:21; Lev. 19:33-34; Deut.10:19; Ezek. 22:7).B. A foreigner was permitted to require interest from an Israelite.
2) Laws for collateral focused on protecting the debtor.
3) The interest that they could charge was regulated in Exodus 22:25 and Leviticus 25:36-37.
Application: These verses speak of the loaner's concern for those who are in need and helping them to get back on their feet and not just about somebody getting the opportunity to make money. This is a good principle that could be applied in the church today in light of Galatians 6:10, "As we have therefore opportunity, let us do good unto all men, especially unto them who are of the household of faith." (KJV).
IV. Making Vows (23:21-23).
1. Vows were common in the Old Testament world, and they became a part of the Israelites system of offerings and are mentioned frequently with the sacrificial offerings (Lev.27; Num.30).
2. A Israelite could make a vow to give the Lord something, or do something for Him in return for a special blessing, or to abstain from doing something in order to please the Lord (Judg 11:30-31).
A. It purpose was to enhance their relationship with God.
B. The purpose was also for a blessing and not for the purpose of binding.
3. What these verse teach about vows.
A. Vows were totally voluntary (v.22).
B. If no vow was made, then no sin is committed (v.22).
C. God holds us accountable for our voluntary vows (vv.21, 23b).1) The Lord requires it. Failure to pay is sinful (v.21).
2) Payment of vows is often mentioned by psalmist and prophet (Psa 22:25; 50:14; Isa 19:21; Jonah 2:9; Nah 1:15).
|
Vows |
FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy
23:21-23 "When thou shalt vow a vow unto the LORD thy God, thou shalt not
slack to pay it: for the LORD thy God will surely require it of thee; and
it would be sin in thee. [22] But if thou shalt forbear to
vow, it shall be no sin in thee. [23] That which is gone out
of thy lips thou shalt keep and perform; even a freewill offering, according
as thou hast vowed unto the LORD thy God, which thou hast promised with
thy mouth."
"Vows" or promises made to the Lord God were common among the Israelites. The Israelite could make a vow to give the Lord something, or do something for Him in return for a special blessing, or to abstain from doing something in order to please the Lord. Vows were always voluntary, as our text states "if thou shalt forbear to vow, it shall be no sin in thee". However, once you make a vow to God, He does consider it an act of sin if you back out of your promise. Once you say it before Him, consider it a contract - and realize that He may yet "require it of thee" if you back away from the promise you made. C.H. Spurgeon stated: "do not suffer all the lavish treasure of grace to be wasted upon you. Follow after holiness; it is the Christian's crown and glory. An unholy church! it is useless to the world, and of no esteem among men. It is an abomination, hell's laughter, heaven's abhorrence. The worst evils which have ever come upon the world have been brought upon her by an unholy church. O Christian, the vows of God are upon you. You are God's priest: act as such. You are God's king: reign over your lusts. You are God's chosen: do not associate with Belial. Heaven is your portion: live like a heavenly spirit, so shall you prove that you have true faith in Jesus, for there cannot be faith in the heart unless there be holiness in the life. "Lord, I desire to live as one
Nothing is more shameful to God than the believer who vows a vow before the Throne, then reneges on that vow. When we accepted Christ as Savior we vowed a vow before Him to follow that Savior as closely as He would empower us to do. Some in the Church have forgotten the first freewill vow, the promise made to the great High Priest Jesus. When we forget that first vow, that first promise, we are backslidden. When we make other vows to our Creator, we are to be very careful not to make light promises to our Maker. We are in relationship with Him, and He demands that we keep the promises we make. If we do not keep those promises, and being human we often don't, then we come under Father's hand of judgment. Our Lord Jesus Christ warned us: SUPPORTING ~ Matthew 5:33-37 "Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths: [34] But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God's throne: [35] Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King. [36] Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black. [37] But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil." It is better to consider your words carefully before vowing a vow before God, for "for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil". Or, as James said, SUPPORTING ~ James 5:12, "Above all, my brothers, do not swear--not by heaven or by earth or by anything else. Let your "Yes" be yes, and your "No," no, or you will be condemned." |
D. Vows had to be declared openly and fulfilled obediently (v.23a)4. The avoidance of reckless making of vows seems to underlie verses 22-23.1) Jeremiah and Malachi speak of improper vows (Jer 44:25; Mal 1:14).
2) Numbers 30:2 also stresses that the payment of vows cannot be escaped.- This verse also tells us that certain persons within the family structure are not under responsibility to pay their vows unless certain conditions prevail.
- The same notion is explicit in Proverbs 20:25 and Ecclesiastes 5:4-7, which appear to be an exposition of these verses in Deuteronomy.Application: God's people should be people of their words; James 5:12, "Above all, my brothers, do not swear--not by heaven or by earth or by anything else. Let your "Yes" be yes, and your "No," no, or you will be condemned." (NIV). This passage also teaches us to be careful (thoughtful) of what we say on the spur of the moment, because God holds us accountable.
V. Feeding The Hungry (23:24-25).
1. The right to pick a few grapes from a neighbor's vineyard or to pluck a few kernels of grain in his field as one goes along the way appears to stand on somewhat the same level as gleaning during harvest.
A. It is based on a concern for the immediate need for food and not to give someone the right to carry food away with him.
B. This advantage was not to be abused by putting grapes in a basket or putting a sickle to the neighbor's grain for one's future use.
|
Giving |
FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy
23:24-25 "When thou comest into thy neighbour's vineyard, then thou
mayest eat grapes thy fill at thine own pleasure; but thou shalt not put
any in thy vessel. [25] When thou comest into the standing
corn of thy neighbour, then thou mayest pluck the ears with thine hand;
but thou shalt not move a sickle unto thy neighbour's standing corn."
The Israelite was allowed to eat the food of his neighbor's field for SUSTENANCE, but not for profit. Again, we see that the character of God emphasizes relationship over rights. Though it might be my field, though they might be my grapes or my corn, I owned these things because God allowed me to have them. And the word "mine" does not come into the equation when the my neighbor is hungry. James used the brother or sister in a destitute state to prove a point: SUPPORTING ~ James 2:15-17 "If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, [16] And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit? [17] Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone." I can be the "big man" in the Church, the Pastor or the Chairman of the Deacons. I can be an outward "pillar of the community". But if I can look at my brother or sister and ignore their need, if I can look at those for whom Christ died and have no compassion in my heart, then my faith is but an ALLEGED thing. If you are saved, then you are a NEW CREATURE, a child of the Spirit of God, a child by the Blood of Christ. You are bought, but not just bought, you are BORN AGAIN. How can the born again of God turn their back on those suffering in our midst? How can the born again of Christ reject those of other skin tones, of other stations in life, of other race, and not feel the Spirit grieving inside? Your works do not save you, but if you are saved you will have the heart of Christ toward the poor and hungry. The disciples bade our Lord, "Leave, let them get their own meals", while Jesus said, "No, gather the few fish and bread, and Father will provide". Wesley stated: "What will such a charity as this, that consists in bare words, avail either you or the poor? Will you come before God with such empty shows of charity as these? You might as well pretend that your love and charity will stand the test without acts of mercy as think that a profession of faith will bear you out before God without works of piety and obedience. Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being along," We are too apt to rest in a bare profession of faith, and to think that this will save us; it is a cheap and easy religion to say, "We believe the articles of the Christian faith;" but it is a great delusion to imagine that this is enough to bring us to heaven. Those who argue thus wrong God, and put a cheat upon their own souls; a mock-faith is as hateful as mock-charity, and both show a heart dead to all real godliness. You may as soon take pleasure in a dead body, void of soul, or sense, or action, as God take pleasure in a dead faith, where there are no works." |
2. According to one Jewish tradition, these verses refer only to persons who were hired to work in the vineyard or field.
3. The dispute over grain plucking between the Pharisees and Jesus in Matthew 12:1-8 did not take place because the disciples plucked someone else's grain, but because they did it on the Sabbath.
A. On other days this action would not have been forbidden.Application: The lesson that God was teaching the Israelites here was that they were to be kind and generous to those who were in need.
B. Edersheim (LTJM, 2:56) points out that the disciples were guilty of a breach of rabbinic law, not biblical law.